SAT阅读解题方法详细解析

　　为了帮助大家高效备考SAT，新东方在线SAT频道为大家带来“SAT阅读解题方法详细解析”，希望对大家SAT备考有所帮助。更多精彩尽请关注新东方在线SAT频道!

　　SAT阅读解题方法详细解析

　　SAT阅读考试中题型很多，但是说到大家相对比较陌生的也不多，其中双篇文章理解题 (Synthesis Questions)就是一个比较典型的。

　　SAT考试会出现双篇短篇或者双篇长篇文章考察考生的综合归纳阅读能力，这两篇文章会讨论相同或相似的主题。双篇文章的后面有几道阅读题目是需要进行两篇文章的主旨进行综合归纳和对比。两篇文章可能是相互对立的，相互支持的，或者是从不同角度对某一主题进行不同阐述。

　　一般情况下，先读完两篇文章然后再进行答题，但是遇到两篇长篇文章，可以边阅读边完成有关第一篇文章的题目，然后再如此完成第二篇文章的有关题目，最后做双篇文章理解题。当然也可以选择读完两篇之后再做题，学生要根据自己的阅读做题习惯选择最有效的做题方式。

　　理解推断题的问题经常以以下形式出现：

　　The author of Passage 2 would most likely view Julian’s statement in Passage 1 with……

　　Unlike the author of Passage 2, the author of Passage 1 develops his or her argument by……

　　Which best characterizes the overall relationship between the two passages?

　　Both passages call attention to which aspect of……?

　　The author of Passage 2 would most likely criticize the author of Passage 1 for……

　　解题技巧:

　　l 阅读的同时划出表示作者观点和主旨的语句，并在第二篇文章旁边做出注释说明。在做双篇阅读理解题目的时候，绝对不要掺入考生自己的观点，要对双篇文章的观点及其关联性持清醒态度。

　　例一：

　　Passage 1

　　A reform movement in journalism is afoot in newsroom and boardrooms across the country. Industry organizations are launching initiatives, offering training and fostering new ways of thinking about news coverage and its effects. The goals are to reinstall journalism’s core values, regain credibility, and generally better the media’s performance. What really is wrong with journalism? Lack of accuracy and fairness, too much sensationalism and bias are all components of the problem, but the number one issue is that “people distrust our motives” said Tome Rosenstiel, founding director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, who hopes to get more journalists thinking about standards.

　　Passage 2

　　Conditions for journalism have never been better: robust media profits, strong legal protections, and sophisticated technology. Yet there is an influential movement, representing the consensus of the profession’s elite, dedicated to convincing us that all is not well. Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel , arguably the two most prominent media critics in America, are the go-to people if you need a quotation lamenting the sensationalism of television newscasts or other media ills. Their recent book The Elements of Journalism suggests that unless a certain “theory of news” is adhered to , the United States might be annihilated. Such factually uncluttered hyperbole does not merely invite a certain awe but also quite plausibly violates their number one axiom: “journalism’s first obligation is to the truth.”

　　Question: Which best describes the relationship between Passage 1 and Passage 2?

　　(A) Passage 1 describes a particular campaign for change, whereas Passage 2 challenges the necessity of that change.

　　(B) Passage 1 describes the causes of sensationalism in journalism, whereas Passage 2 explores its effects.

　　(C) Passage 1 praises an individual’s influence on journalism, whereas Passage 2 questions that individual’s contributions.

　　(D) Passage 1 suggests that journalism is evolving whereas Passage 2 argues that it is stagnating.

　　(E) Passage 1 defines the purpose of journalism, whereas Passage 2 examines journalism’s impact on society.

　　解析：

　　第一段的主旨句在从The goals are…开始，说明这次运动的目的是要重新树立新闻界的核心价值，重新建立新闻业的可信度，提高新闻价值。第二段开头就表明现在的新闻业

　　气候很好，后面就开始批判第一段提到的运动的必要性，主题句为最后一句，关键词语为violate their number one axiom， 即二段作者认为第一段提倡的新闻革命或新闻运动违背了新闻业的首要核心原则：新闻的真实性。所以只有A 选项符合两段的主旨，第一段文章描述了一个运动，而第二段却质疑了这场运动的意义。

　　l 阅读第二篇文章的时候，要考虑它和第一篇文章的关系，哪个部分肯定第一段，哪部分和第一段观点形成对立，或者两篇文章有什么关系。做相关题目的时候要学会准确分析定义两篇文章之间的关系。

　　Passage 1

　　Food has always been considered one of the most salient markers of cultural traditions. When I was a small child, food was the only thing that helped identify my family as Filipino American. We ate pansit lug-lug (a noodle fish) and my father put patis (salty fish sauce) on everything. However, even this connection lessened as I grew older. As my parents, became more acculturated, we ate less typically Filipino food. When I was twelve, my mother took cooking classes and learned to make French and Italian dishes. When I was in high school, we ate chicken marsala and shrimp fra Diablo more often than Filipino dishes like pansit lug-lug.

　　Passage 2

　　Jean Anthelme Brillat-Savarin-who in 1825 confidently announced. “Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you who you are” - would have no trouble describing cultural identities of the United States. Our food reveals us as tolerant adventurers who do not feel constrained by tradition. We “play with our food” far more readily than we preserve the culinary rules of our varied ancestors. Americans have no single national cuisine. What unites American eaters culturally is how we eat, not what we eat. As eaters, Americans mingles the culinary traditions of many regions and cultures. We are multiethnic eaters.

　　Question: The author of Passage 2 would most likely regard the mother’s willingness to “make French and Italian dishes” (line 9-10, Passage 1) as

　　(A) laughably pretentious

　　(B) understandably conservative

　　(C) typically American

　　(D) a regrettable compromise

　　(E) a surprising attitude

　　解析：其实第一段已经表明作者妈妈上了烹饪班之后，烹调的食物就不是那么典型的菲律宾食物了，她会愿意做一些法国菜和意大利菜，而这些事物都是在美国学习的。下一段的主旨则是美国风味的饮食就是沿袭了各国的美食传统，所以二段文章的作者一定会认为一段提到的作风是典型的美国人的烹调方法。

　　以上就是关于“SAT阅读解题方法详细解析”的内容，更多精彩内容，请关注SAT频道!

SAT水平能力测试【0元免费测试】