2025年9月20日上午场托福写作完整版答案及解析（含范文）

2025-10-13 11:29:58来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年SAT考试时间报名费用报考指南成绩查询送分流程成绩要求成绩换算
【资料推荐】SAT词汇巴朗3500系列SAT阅读OG1-8经典错题解析SAT数学满分冲刺重要知识点
【备考指导】CB发布2018年SAT考试官方报告SAT北美考点汇总美国大学TOP100SAT成绩要求

　　2025年9月20日的托福考试已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作题目，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作题目

第一套

　　●综合写作哺乳动物重复2025.6.28

阅读

听力

　主题：蝙蝠的未来

　　对蝙蝠的未来保持乐观，并提出了三个解决方案

　　1.适应性行为: 剩余的蝙蝠通过更密集地群居在更少的树洞中来适应鹦鹉的威胁，这些巢穴尚未被鹦鹉侵占，因此蝙蝠可能不会立即消失。

　　听力讲座观点:对阅读中的每一个解决方案都表示悲观并予以反驳密集群居的风险:

　　1.讲座认为，这种拥挤的居住条件会导致寄生虫(parasites))非常容易在蝙蝠之擡散收城害太漵懲睥颟鸞间传播，从而引发感染和死亡，因此这种生存方式不可持续

　　2.人工巢穴: conservationists(环保主义者)可以在公园里设置蝙蝠箱。这种特殊设计的箱子能吸引蝙蝠却不适合鹦鹉居住，从而为蝙蝠提供安全的繁殖场所，帮助其数量增长。

　　2.蝙蝠箱的局限性: 讲座指出，蝙蝠习惯于在老树的树洞中筑巢，而不习惯使用全新的人工蝙蝠箱。这个适应过程可能需要好几代蝙蝠的时间，但塞维利亚的蝙蝠种群可能在那之前就已灭绝

　　3.根除外来物种: 可以通过根除(eradication)玫瑰环鹦鹉来拯救蝙蝠。西班牙法律允许这样做，以此消除鹦鹉对蝙蝠的生存威胁。

　　3.根除计划的现实阻力: 讲座承认根除鹦鹉可能有效，但在现实中不可行。他举例说明，几年前当地政府曾尝试根除计划，但因公众的强烈反对(public opposition)(如网上请愿书)而被迫取消未来任何类似的计划也很可能遭遇同样的阻力。

　　●学术讨论社会现象重复2025.6.14上午场/2025.7.23上午场/2025.8.27上午场/2025.9.13下午场/2025.9.20上午场

　　Your professor is teaching a class on urban planning. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea-creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free, which means that vehicles are not allowed to enter the city centers. Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free? Why or why not?

　　Kelly:I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents-it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere. people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.

　　Paul:It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My main concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because the customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they can't drive, they won't go at all.

第二套

　　●综合写作教育重复2019年4月13日

阅读

听力

　主题：参加社区服务作为高中生毕业的条件

　　总论点:将参加社区服务作为高中生毕业的必须条件并不是一个好主意。

　　分论点一：学校无法监管每位学生的志愿行为，所以无法确认哪些学生真正按要求完成了志愿活动。一名高中生可能只是在父母或者祖父母的花园里进行了清理工作而被记录为志愿活动。

　　总论点:阅读提出的三个疑问都可以被解答，

　　分论点一:学校要求学生提供的志愿者服务是由专门的机构组织进行的，一般在公共场所进行。并且学生参加志愿者活动的时间也是由这些组织反馈给学校的。

　　分论点二：被强制要求进行志愿者服务可能会导致学生之后不愿意提供志愿者服务。因为高中生现在提供的志愿者服务可以获得毕业证书，所以他们今后在会觉得提供志愿服务的人总是有回报的。

　　分论点二:很多高中生在医院进行志愿服务或者辅导小孩子后，会觉得参加志愿服务是一个非常好的体验。学校让学生参加志愿者活动就是给他们一个机会有这样好的体验，给他们一个动力motivation在今后提供更多的志愿服务

　　分论点三：强制要求高中生进行志愿服务是一种侵犯学生权利的行为。

　　分论点三:要求学生参加志愿者活动，就类似于学校要求学生参加课程一样，并没有侵害学生的权利。

　　●学术讨论科技

　　Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:This week, we discussed the role of technology in society. One idea we discussed was access to mobile (cell) phones across different age groups. It seems that almost everyone has a phone these days. In your opinion, what are the positive or negative effects of parents allowing their children under the age of 12 to have their own mobile phones? Why do you think so?

　　Kelly:One positive effect is that phones help keep children busy. Since phones often include different applications that can help entertain children, they will never feel bored because of having nothing to do. In fact, children these days are usually engaged in playing fun, interesting games on their phones all the time, which is better than being bored.

　　Paul:Children should not have access to mobile phones until they are in their teens: these phones may do them more harm than good. Not knowing the potential damage that can be caused by spending too much time looking at their phone screens, children sometimes negatively affect their health. For example, by straining their eyes or making them tired.

　　范文：

　　I believe children under the age of 12 should not be allowed to own a phone. This is because young children, especially those under 12, often lack self-control. When faced with a virtual world, they could easily become obsessed with their phones, which would hamper their physical development. For example, when my nephew was 10 years old, he was given a smartphone. The first time he saw the well-designed games, fashionable idols, and platforms where he could comment on whatever he like, he quickly indulged himself in it and spent time he might otherwise playing football with friends or constructing a Lego building. However, half a year later, he became nearsighted and began to wear glasses, which has been a lifelong problem for him. Therefore, I hold the view that children under 12 should not possess a phone.