【托福写作机经】2024年10月12日托福考试回忆

2024-11-29 15:45:14来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年SAT考试时间报名费用报考指南成绩查询送分流程成绩要求成绩换算
【资料推荐】SAT词汇巴朗3500系列SAT阅读OG1-8经典错题解析SAT数学满分冲刺重要知识点
【备考指导】CB发布2018年SAT考试官方报告SAT北美考点汇总美国大学TOP100SAT成绩要求

　　2024年10月12日的托福考已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作机经，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作机经

综合写作

阅读

听力

主题：reintroducing wolves in national parks and rural areas

1. One problem is that wolves are highly effective predators, and their reintroduction upsets the balance of the local ecosystem. In Yellowstone National Park, for example, the elk population declined by more than 50 percent during the first fifteen years after wolves were introduced. (Elk are large plant-eaters that influence the growth of many plants and provide food for predators other than wolves, such as bears.)

1. First, it's true that reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone park reduced the elk population, but it's not true that this harmed the ecosystem. On the contrary, you see, originally more than one hundred years ago, both elk and wolves lived in the Yellowstone ecosystem. But when the wolves disappeared from Yellowstone, the elk population became unnaturally large. The elks started overgrazing the vegetation in the park, endangering many plants that were important in that ecosystem. Bringing wolves back to Yellowstone has actually restored the natural balance in the park. It stopped the overgrazing of vegetation by the elks, and because of that, many important plants were able to recover.

2. A second problem is that wolves present an economic threat in the areas where they are introduced. For example, there are quite a few livestock ranches that border nature reserves and state parks where wolves have been reintroduced. Wolves have been known to attack large livestock such as sheep. Thus, many ranchers fear that the reintroduction of wolves will result in serious economic losses for them.

2. The passage also claims that ranchers are afraid they will lose a lot of their sheep and other livestock to wolves. Well, wolves typically attack farm animals only if their natural wild food is too scarce. But wild animals that wolves prey on are plentiful in the areas where the wolves have been reintroduced. And even if some wolves do harm livestock, the rancher is paid for damages out of a government fund. So in practice, there is no real economic threat to farmers from the introduction of wolves.

3. A third problem is that wolves present a direct danger to humans. Wolf packs tend to do well in the environments in which they are introduced, so their population grows over time, and eventually they spread into new territory, places where they come into more frequent contact with people. This is especially true in national parks, where people gather to explore and appreciate nature. Introducing wolves to these areas creates a serious risk for the people who visit the areas or live in them.

3. Third, wolves posing a danger to humans. Well, people tend to be afraid of wolves just like they're afraid of any large predator. What's probably contributing to the sphere is that since the reintroductions, people who have been hearing wolves in areas where wolves haven't lived for many decades. Wolves howling is very loud and can sound very frightening if you're not used to it. But the fear of wolves is not really based on fact. There have been very few documented wolf attacks on humans in the united states, and none of them involved reintroduced wolves.

学术讨论

　　Your professor is teaching a class on. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Diaz:Let's explore the dynamics of social interactions and their impact on our well-being. Socializing in smaller groups versus larger circles can have varying effects on one's health and happiness. Some argue that

smaller groups foster deeper connections, allowing for more meaningful interactions and a sense of closeness. Conversely, larger friend circles offer diversity and exposure to different perspectives. Which do you think contributes more to a person's health and happiness: spending time with a close-knit few or a larger group of friends?

　　Kelly:Developing strong bonds with a few close friends fosters deeper connections and enhances emotional support. These intimate relationships often lead to increased trust and understanding, allowing for genuine empathy and shared experiences. Small friend groups offer a sense of security and authenticity in interactions, promoting mental well-being.

　　Andrew: Having a wide circle of friends offers diverse perspectives and experiences, enriching one's social life. Numerous friendships provide a larger support network, creating opportunities for various activities and interests. Engaging with a larger group cultivates adaptability, social skills, and exposure to different cultures or ideas, contributing to personal growth.

　　范文：

　　Spending time with a close-knit group of friends can have a significant impact on a person's health and happiness. Research has shown that individuals with a close network of friends experienced lower levels of cortisol, a stress hormone that can negatively impact health when chronically elevated. This suggests that having a support system of close friends can help buffer against the negative effects of stress on the body.

　　In addition, a sense of belonging and support from friends can also improve mental health. Having friends who understand and empathize with your struggles can provide a sense of validation and comfort during difficult times. This can help reduce feelings of loneliness and isolation, which are risk factors for mental health issues like depression and anxiety.

　　Personally, I have experienced the benefits of spending time with a close-knit group of friends. During a particularly challenging period in my life, my friends were there to provide emotional support, a listening ear, and practical help when needed. Their presence not only helped alleviate my stress and worries, but also brought joy and laughter into my life. I felt more connected, understood, and supported, which greatly contributed to my overall well-being.