【托福写作机经】2024年10月16日托福考试回忆

2024-11-29 15:57:03来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年SAT考试时间报名费用报考指南成绩查询送分流程成绩要求成绩换算
【资料推荐】SAT词汇巴朗3500系列SAT阅读OG1-8经典错题解析SAT数学满分冲刺重要知识点
【备考指导】CB发布2018年SAT考试官方报告SAT北美考点汇总美国大学TOP100SAT成绩要求

　　2024年10月16日的托福考已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作机经，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作机经

综合写作

阅读

听力

主题：whether the mask is a fake

1. First, Schliemann had a history of fake discoveries. For example, Schliemann once bought an ancient statue from someone, took it to a site that was being excavated, and then claimed to have discovered the statue there. We should be skeptical about the warrior king's mask, given Schliemann's dishonest behavior on other occasions.

1. First, it's true that Schliemann had a reputation for dishonesty. But precisely because of this reputation, his work was actually closely watched by others. The Greek government took seriously the accusations of Schliemann's dishonesty. So they appointed a supervisor to oversee his work and make sure he didn't do anything dishonest. This supervisor washed Schliemann closely. It's unlikely that Schliemann could have placed a fake mask in the tomb without being caught.

2. Second, there are notable differences between Schliemann's mask and genuine ancient Greek masks that have been found in other tombs. Schliemann's warrior king mask has a mouth with well-defined lips. Other Greek masks have mouths that are more or less flat. Also, the warrior king's mask has a pointed beard that doesn't resemble the facial hair represented on any of the other gold masks.

2. Second, although Schliemann's mask differed from many other Greek masks, there was another artifact found at the same site, whose features were similar to Schliemann's mask. This other artifact, which is clearly old and clearly authentic, was a gold ceremonial object in the shape of a lion's head. The lion's lips are well defined looks like those on the king's m. And the lion has a beard whose overall shape and finer details make it similar to the beard on the king's mask. It looks like the same ancient goldsmith made both objects. The lion's head and the king's mask discovered by Schliemann. That would suggest that the mask is genuine.

3. Third, Schliemann closed the site where he was excavating soon after the mask was found. That seems quite suspicious. Most archaeologists would have continued to work at the site after finding such an object in the hope of gaining knowledge about it. Many questions about the mask-whom it represented, what its function was—could have possibly been answered by further examination of the site. Schliemann's abrupt closing of the site indicates that he did not need to find out more about the mask because he knew it was a fake.

3. Third, the timing of the excavation's closing might seem strange if an archaeologist working today did that. But in Schliemann's time, it would have been quite normal. See, like many archaeologists of his time, Schliemann was something of a treasure hunter. He was primarily interested in finding valuable objects, not in understanding the cultures that produce those objects. And he was experienced enough to know when a site's most valuable objects had been found. Soon after finding the gold mask of the warrior king, he concluded there wasn't anything of value left at the site, so he stopped exploring. Summarize the points made in the lecture. To explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading.

学术讨论

　　Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Diaz:In recent years, the rise of artificial intelligence has introduced Al generators to draft essays and articles. While some people believe this is a valuable tool that can help writers save time and enhance their creativity. Others argue that relying on Al undermines the development of writing skills and critical thinking. Do you think Al generators should be restricted? Please explain your reasoning.

　　Kelly:I think Al generators should be restricted, mainly due to the high risk of plagiarism. Since Al doesn't always cite its sources, writers could unintentionally use ideas from others without proper attribution. For example, relying too much on Al could result in students facing academic penalties if their work is flagged for unoriginal content.

　　Andrew: I believe Al generators should continue to be used because they help writers focus on polishing their work rather than getting stuck on initial drafts. From my experience, Al can highlight mistakes or improve structure, lt allows me to spend more time refining their ideas, ultimately producing higher-quality essays

　　范文：

　　The use of AI generators to draft essays and articles should not be restricted as they provide valuable support and assistance to writers, enabling them to produce high-quality content efficiently and effectively. In today's fast-paced world, where deadlines are tight and demands are high, AI generators offer a convenient solution to help writers meet their goals.

　　One concrete piece of evidence supporting this view is the success of popular AI writing tools such as Grammarly and Hemingway Editor. These tools have become indispensable for many writers, providing real-time feedback on grammar, spelling, and readability while also offering suggestions for improvement. By using these AI generators, writers are able to save time and effort in the editing process, ultimately enhancing the quality of their work.

　　Furthermore, my personal anecdote can attest to the benefits of using AI generators in writing. As a freelance writer, I often face tight deadlines and pressure to produce high-quality content. In such situations, I have found AI generators to be extremely helpful in generating initial drafts and organizing my thoughts. By using these tools, I am able to focus on refining and enhancing my ideas, rather than getting stuck on the initial writing process. This has not only improved the efficiency of my work but also elevated the overall quality of my writing.

　　In conclusion, AI generators offer valuable support to writers and should not be restricted. By leveraging the power of technology, writers can enhance their productivity and produce better content. As the demand for quality writing continues to grow, it is important to embrace and utilize AI generators as tools to aid and improve our writing process.