【托福写作机经】2025年2月15日托福考试回忆

　　2025年2月15日的托福考试已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作机经，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

写作 第一套

综合写作 历史 重复 23.9.6

学术讨论【教育】

　　Your professor is teaching a class on education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　• express and support your personal opinion

　　• make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:Today, we're discussing whether there should be a specific age to mark adulthood. Traditionally, 18 years old is considered the transition to adult hood in many cultures, but some argue that 18-year-olds are not mature enough to take on adult responsibilities and duties. Others suggest that 21 might be a more appropriate age, while some believe adulthood should not be defined by age at all. Should there be a specific age for adulthood, or should it be based on individual maturity and circumstances?

　　Paul:I believe 21 years old should be the mark of adulthood. Most 18-year-olds are still in school and rely heavily on their parents for financial and emotion a support. At 18, many young people are just beginning to explore their independence and may not have the life experience or maturity to handle adult responsibilities. By 21 years old, however,individuals are more likely to have completed their education, gained some work experience, and developed the skills needed to navigate adulthood.

　　Kelly:I don't think adulthood should be defined by a specific age, Maturity and responsibility vary greatly from person to person, and some individuals are capable of handling adult duties at a much younger age. For example, in many cultures, young people take on family responsibilities, such as caring for siblings or contributing to household income, long before they turn 18. Defining adulthood by age ignores these differences and overlooks the fact that life experiences, not just age, shape a person's readiness for adulthood.

　　范文：

　　From my perspective, it could be more advantageous to define childhood based on individual maturity, due to the environment for children to develop varies among different families.

　　Inevitably, though at young age, children no longer are primarily restricted to childish games like before, who mostly are exposed to more abundant living environment owing to the Internet having emerged for decades. Thus, children with more possibilities would cultivate mature personality at a relatively young age and may even try to integrate into adults life

　　especially with a cyber identity. This makes their behavior should be regarded with similar standard as adults since they may also accumulate sufficient background information or even be fully aware of adults emotions. For instance, in spite of age difference, some younger teenagers might feel the same sympathetic as adults to do charity for those with poverty and may also commit a crime to bully others with tarnished reputation online. Therefore, their

　　behavior, no matter positive or negative, should be taken into account with more mature criteria like adults and sometimes are obliged to receive punishments differentiated from simply detention but more severe penalties.

写作 第二套

　　综合写作 历史

学术讨论【教育】

　　Your professor is teaching a class on child education. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　• express and support your personal opinion

　　• make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:Today, we're discussing parenting styles. Some parents think that giving children money for their high grades motivates children to work harder and achieve better academic results, while others believe it can have negative long-term effects on a child's attitude toward learning. What are your thoughts? Should parents offer their school-age children money as a reward for earning high grades in school?

　　Paul:I don't think it's a good idea to pay children for good grades. While it might seem like an effective way to motivate them in the short term, it can send the wrong message about the purpose of learning. Children might start focusing only on the money rather than developing a genuine interest in education or understanding the value of knowledge. Over time, this could lead to a lack of intrinsic motivation, where they only study for external rewards instead of personal growth.

　　Kelly:I believe offering money for high grades can be a good idea. lt gives children a clear incentive to work hard and stay focused on their studies, especially when they might not yet understand the long-term benefits of education. For example, younger children often respond well to tangible rewards, and this can help them build good study habits early on. Over time, children may develop a sense of accomplishment and pride in their work, even without the financial incentive.

　　范文：

　　From my perspective, giving money as a reward seems to be more beneficial since this may help develop more awareness of money making and management for children. Clearly, children tend to imitate and interpret adult’s behavior while growing up, thus urging parents to be wise enough and the financial support could be a fantastic way to stimulate children’s desire to learn the value of money or even some basic rules in the society. Thus, what impacts the children would not only be some incentives to learn to mange money but to figure out methods to set profitable goals and strive for them. For instance, my younger brother was rewarded with money whenever his GPA reached an ideal level. He, then, insisted on making clearer plans for any profitable programs on or off campus at a young age and started to buy stalks before graduation from high school. These irreplaceable experiences as a whole attributed to his success in saving quite large sums of money as college tuition and even consistently supported his campus life later. Therefore, receiving money as rewards definitely will do children a great favor in the field of finance.

写作 第三套

综合写作 哺乳动物 重复 24.9.7

学术讨论【政府福利】

　　Your professor is teaching a class on transportation. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　• express and support your personal opinion

　　• make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:Today, we're discussing the effects of various transportation means. Some argue that bicycles are an eco-friendly and healthy alternative to cars,while others believe that relying on outdated modes of transport is not a

　　practical solution to modern traffic problems. What are your thoughts?

　　Should the government encourage the use of bicycles as a means of transportation?

　　Paul:I don't think the government should encourage bicycles as a primary solution. In today's world, we should rely on technology to solve traffic problems, not return to primitive methods. For example, self-driving cars and smart traffic systems can optimize road usage and reduce congestion more effectively than bicycles. instead of promoting bicycles,

　　the government should invest in advanced technologies that can provide long-term, stable solutions to traffic issues.

　　Kelly:I believe the government should encourage bicycle use, even if they can't completely replace cars. Bicycles are a great way to reduce traffic congestion and lower carbon emissions, especially for short-distance trips. For instance, if more people rode bicycles to work or school, there would be fewer cars on the road, which could help prevent traffic incidents. Encouraging bicycle use doesn't mean abandoning cars altogether, it's about creating a balanced transportation system that benefits everyone.

　　范文：

　　From my perspective, encouraging more bicycle use undoubtedly plays a crucial role in allowing more residents to alter previous sedentary lifestyles to healthier ones.

　　Undeniably, those fully occupied by tight schedule at work or study have to sit around a whole day accomplishing daily goals, severely jeopardizing their physical condition due to the lack of sufficient exercises. Thus, the compulsory measure from authority surely will force them to ride bikes instead of barely sitting while commuting and the extra efforts in stretching out on bikes will lead to more stimuli in metabolism and help enhance the entire physical condition with better immunity. For instance, my uncle used to largely relied on driving cars to work began to turn to bikes after strict regulations for us last year. He, as well as a majority of his colleagues in the same skyscrapers, joined in the bike crew consequently. Later, more and more workers involved confirmed that their endurance had all been improved and they even could resist some pandemic in cold days. Thus, thus policy has helped a lot in reshaping their physical condition.

【免费领取托福机经完整版】

【托福备考公开课免费领取】

　　PC端访问地址>> 托福|SAT|AP|KET课程免费试听

SAT水平能力测试【0元免费测试】