课程咨询
美国本科留学资料领取

扫码添加助教

免费领取

备考资料大礼包

扫码关注公众号

【托福写作机经】2025年6月28日上午场托福考试回忆

2025-07-02 11:45:45来源:网络

  2025年6月28日的托福考试已经成为回忆,新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作机经,让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作机经

第一套

  综合写作 人类学 重复2025. 04.23

阅读

听力

  主题:鸟食器的影响

   传播疾病更快:阅读指出,鸟食器可能导致鸟类疾病传播速度加快,尤其是对于家雀(house finch)的眼部疾病。因为鸟食器会吸引大量鸟类聚集,增加了疾病传播的风险。

   自然因素更重要:鸟类疾病传播的最重要因素是自然因素,而不是鸟食器。鸟类在自然环境中也会遇到其他群体,疾病传播是不可避免的。鸟食器只是提供了一个聚集的场所,并不是疾病传播的唯一原因。

  可能导致捕食者攻击和撞击窗户:阅读认为,鸟食器可能会吸引捕食者(predator),增加鸟类被捕食的风险。此外,鸟类在寻找食物时可能会撞击窗户(windowstrike),导致伤亡。

  

提供营养,增强新生鸟类的健康和繁殖能力:听力认为,鸟食器可以为鸟类提供必要的营养,这有助于新生鸟类的生长和发育,使它们更强壮,繁殖能力更好,从而增加鸟类的种群数量。虽然可能会有一些鸟类因为捕食者或撞击窗户而死亡,但这些数量远少于因为鸟食器而存活和繁衍的鸟类。

  

  

影响鸟类的自然迁徙顺序:阅读提到,鸟食器可能会延迟鸟类正常的迁徙时间(natural migration order)。因为鸟类依赖鸟食器获取食物,可能会推迟它们的迁徙,从而影响它们的生存和繁衍。


  迁徙时间的决定因素是日照时长:听力反驳说,鸟类的迁徙时间主要由日照时长决定,而不是鸟食器。鸟类能够感知白天变短,从而开始迁徙。鸟食器只是为那些因其他原因滞留的鸟类提供了额外的营养,帮助它们度过难关,而不是延迟它们的迁徙。

学术讨论

  ● 学术讨论 媒体 重复2023.7.31

  Your professor is teaching a class on marketing. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

  In your response, you should

  · express and support your personal opinion

  · make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

  An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

  Doctor Achebe: We have been discussing how technology has fueled an expansion in the availability of information, including the news. Some traditional news sources have a reputation for being fact-based and for presenting multiple views. However, other news sources including some blogs and social media, may present partial, or even in accurate information. What is the best way to determine whether a news source is accurate and reliable or not? Why?

  Kelly: The best way to protect consumers of news from misinformation is through education. In our school, for example, there was a class about evaluating media sources. By constantly questioning journalists' points of view and by considering a variety of sources, we developed a more critical eye and can now better avoid falling victim to propaganda and fake news

  Paul: I don't think it's always possible to know for sure whether news is reliable or not. That's why l try to get most of my news from well-known sources that trust. Those sources may not always have the most up-to-date information, but it is good to know that their reporters have fact-checked the information before they shared it.

  范文:

  To determine whether a news source is accurate and reliable, it is essential to employ a critical approach that includes evaluating several key criteria. Firstly, examining the source’s credibility is crucial. Reliable news organizations typically have a history of fact-checking and adhere to journalistic standards. This can often be identified by looking for sources that are well-established in the field, such as major newspapers and reputable news websites, which have editorial guidelines and accountability measures in place. Secondly, checking for the presence of citations and references is vital. Credible articles often link to original research, official statements, or primary data to back up their claims. This not only provides transparency but also allows readers to verify the information independently. If a source makes bold assertions without evidence or references, it could indicate a lack of reliability. Moreover, assessing the objectivity of the news presented is important. Reliable news sources strive to provide balanced coverage, presenting multiple perspectives on an issue. If a source appears to have a clear bias or consistently favors one viewpoint while disregarding opposing views, it may not provide a complete or accurate representation of the news. Additionally, checking the author’s qualifications can provide insights into the reliability of the information. News articles authored by seasoned journalists with expertise in the topic at hand are generally more trustworthy than those written by unknown or inexperienced writers.

  Finally, considering the publication's transparency regarding corrections and accountability can also be a telling factor. Reliable sources have mechanisms for correcting errors and are open about mistakes. This commitment to accuracy fosters trustworthiness. In conclusion, the best way to determine whether a news source is accurate and reliable is to critically evaluate its credibility, evidence, objectivity, authorship, and accountability. As the information landscape grows increasingly complex with the rise of digital media, employing these strategies will help individuals navigate through misinformation and ensure they are consuming accurate news.

第二套

  综合写作 人类学 重复2025. 05.25

阅读

听力

   主题:利用IVR和传统电话做调查的差异

 更诚实(more honest):人们在面对机器进行调查时,往往会更加诚实。由于没有与真人直接交流,受访者可能会更愿意透露真实的想法和信息,不必担心被评判或产生社交压力,从而能够更真实地表达自己的观点和感受。

    不诚实:尽管调查是通过机器进行的,但大多数人仍然不会完全诚实。例如,当被问及收入等敏感问题时,人们往往会给出模糊或不准确的答案。虽然知道调查对象是机器,但人们明白最终这些数据将由真实的人进行分析和解读,因此仍会有所保留,不会像阅读部分所说的那样完全诚实。

   更可靠(more reliable):IVR系统能够覆盖更广泛的人群。它不受时间和空间的限制,可以同时向大量的人发送调查请求,快速收集大量的数据,从而提高调查的效率和可靠性。相比之下,传统的电话调查需要人工拨打电话,耗费大量的人力和时间,且可能受到调查人员工作时间等因素的限制,难以达到IVR系统那样广泛的调查范围。

 不可靠:与面对真人调查时出于礼貌会完整回答不同,面对机器调查,人们如果不想回答问题,可以随时结束调查。这导致IVR调查收集到的很多数据是不完整的,因为受访者可能在中途就挂断电话或停止回答。相比之下,传统电话调查中,调查人员可以通过与受访者的互动,引导他们完成整个调查,从而获得更完整、更可靠的数据。

  更客观(moreobjective):IVR调查可以避免语音因素(voice factor)的影响。在传统的电话调查中,调查人员的语音语调、语气等可能会对受访者产生潜移默化的影响,导致受访者受到调查人员个人因素的干扰,从而影响调查结果的客观性。而IVR系统使用的是录制好的机器语音,不存在这种个人因素的干扰,因此能够提供更客观的调查环境。

   无法解决语音因素问题:IVR系统并没有真正解决语音因素的问题。因为不同的人对同一种语音和口音会有不同的理解和感受,不存在所谓的“中性语音即使使用机器语音,不同地区、不同文化背景的人对机器语音的接受程度和反应也会有所不同,这同样会对调查结果产生影响,因此不能简单地认为IVR系统就能完全避免语音因素对调查客观性的干扰。


  ● 学术讨论 教育

  Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

  In your response, you should

  · express and support your personal opinion

  · make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

  An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

  Doctor Achebe: We've discussed methods teachers employ to make their course content more engaging for high school students. One possible method is using class time to discuss the ideas students learned in a lecture or assigned reading. While some believe that having students discuss the material with classmates is beneficial, others consider it a waste of class time. What do you think is the most important consideration for teachers when deciding whether to include opportunities for group discussion during class? Why?

  Kelly: I think class size is a key factor when deciding whether to include group discussions. In smaller classes, it's easier for students to share ideas and actually hear each other. But in larger classes, discussions can get chaotic or leave some students out. lf the setting isn't right, group work might end up wasting time instead of helping.

  Paul: The difficulty of the course should be a big factor in deciding whether to include group discussions. lf the material is especially complex, talking it through with classmates can help students better understand it. For example in my physics class, our group discussions often helped me see things from different angles and made tough concepts more manageable.

第三套

  综合写作 人类学 重复2021 06.26

阅读

听力

   主题:在撒哈拉沙漠发现的陨石是否来自水星Mercury)

陨石的颜色很淡:撒哈拉沙漠中发现的陨石呈现出很淡的颜色,这种颜色特征与水星的表面岩石颜色相符。水星的表面由于其独特的地质成分和长期的太空风化作用,呈现出较浅的颜色,因此从颜色上判断,这些陨石很可能是来自水星的碎片。

 其他星体也有符合这一特征的:虽然陨石的颜色很淡,但并非只有水星具有这种颜色特征。宇宙中存在许多其他星体,它们的岩石成分和环境也可能导致类似的颜色表现。因此,仅凭颜色这一特征,并不能确定陨石一定来自水星,其他星体同样有可能产生这种颜色的陨石。

  陨石的磁力很低:这些陨石的磁力非常低,这与水星的磁力特质相符合。水星的磁场相对较弱,其岩石在形成和长期的太空环境中,保持了这种低磁力的特性。因此,从磁力的角度来看,陨石的这一特性也支持它们是水星碎片的观点。

 陨石中含有特殊的化学成分:在撒哈拉沙漠发现的陨石中含有一种特殊的化学成分,而这种成分在水星上很少出现。这表明陨石的成分与水星的岩石成分存在明显差异,从而质疑了陨石来自水星的观点。如果陨石真的是水星的碎片,那么它们的化学成分应该与水星的岩石成分更为接近,而不是存在这种特殊的、在水星中很少见的成分。

  

 水星和其他行星的碰撞产生的速度:水星在宇宙中与其他行星发生碰撞时产生的速度足以使碎片抵达地球。这种碰撞产生的巨大能量和速度,使得碎片能够克服太空中的各种阻力和引力作用,最终到达地球表面。因此,从动力学的角度分析,水星与其他行星的碰撞为陨石抵达地球提供了可能。

 

陨石被撞飞的速度和热量:陨石被撞飞的速度非常高,会产生很大的热量这种高温会使陨石表面产生一些新的物质,改变其原有的化学和物理特性。

然而,实际上并没有发现这些新物质的存在,这表明陨石在被撞飞的过程中并没有经历足够的高温来产生这些变化。因此,从这一角度来看,陨石的来源可能并非水星,因为水星与其他行星的碰撞产生的速度和热量并不足以支持这一观点。

  ● 学术讨论 社会现象

  Your professor is teaching a class on psychology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

  In your response, you should

  · express and support your personal opinion

  · make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

  An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

  Doctor Achebe: Today, we're looking at the challenges working parents face in balancing their professional responsibilities with child care. As more families rely on dual incomes parents often struggle to find enough time and energy to care for their children effectively. This issue raises questions about work-life balance, flexible job options and support systems. What do you think is the best way for working parents to ensure they can care for their children effectively? Why?

  Kelly: I think flexible work hours are the best solution. My cousin, for example, shifted to a remote job so he could help his daughter with schoolwork during the day. Having control over his schedule allowed him to be present without sacrificing his job performance.

  Paul: I believe the key is strong support systems, like grandparents or trusted daycare centers. My mom was a nurse with long shifts, and we relied on my aunt to help. Without that network, it would've been impossible for her to manage both work and parenting

【免费领取托福机经完整版】

【托福备考公开课免费领取】

  PC端访问地址>> 托福|SAT|AP|KET课程免费试听


SAT水平能力测试【0元免费测试】

美本留学资料大礼包

微信扫描二维码 回复【美本资料】

机考SATCB官方样题|可汗练习题|AP全科大纲/备考资料包

更多资料
更多>>
更多内容

添加美本助教号

自动领取备考资料大礼包

1. 打开手机微信【扫一扫】,识别上方二维码;
2.添加【美本助教】,自动领取留学备考资料大礼包。

可汗学院新SAT题目完整版

微信扫描下方二维码 即可获取

SAT1500分录播课(旗舰版+1对1) 托福精讲录播课(旗舰版) 托福8-10人直播VIP小班
更多>>
更多公开课>>

2025美本留学资料免费领取

微信添加美本助教

新东方美本助教
更多>>
更多资料

添加新东方在线美本助教号

自动领取备考资料大礼包

1. 打开手机微信【扫一扫】,识别上方二维码;
2.添加【Ella助教】,自动领取留学备考资料大礼包。