扫码添加助教

免费领取

备考资料大礼包

扫码关注公众号

2025年9月6日上午场托福写作完整版答案及解析（含范文）

2025-09-15 16:37:36来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年SAT考试时间报名费用报考指南成绩查询送分流程成绩要求成绩换算
【资料推荐】SAT词汇巴朗3500系列SAT阅读OG1-8经典错题解析SAT数学满分冲刺重要知识点
【备考指导】CB发布2018年SAT考试官方报告SAT北美考点汇总美国大学TOP100SAT成绩要求

　　2025年9月6日的托福考试已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作题目，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作题目

第一套

　　●综合写作植物保护

阅读

听力

　主题：美国栗树濒危问题及保护策略的争

　　科学家认为，通过销毁所有已感染该真菌的美国栗树，能够切断真菌的传播源，从而减缓其扩散速度，保护未受感染的树木。

　　该策略无法达到预期效果。因为除了美国栗树，橡树(oak tree)等其他树种也能携带并传播这种真菌。即便销毁了所有受感染的美国栗树，真菌仍会通过这些其他树种继续扩散，持续威胁健康的美国栗树。

　　科学家提议，为美国栗树注射特定病毒，利用病毒杀死危害树木的真菌，以此挽救美国栗树。

　　此策略在实际操作中存在巨大障碍。由于该病毒难以自行在树木间传播，若要覆盖广泛的美国栗树种群，科学家和管理人员必须人工为每一棵美国栗树注射病毒。这种逐一注射的方式不仅需要投入大量人力，还会耗费极多时间与资金，成本过高且效率低下，不具备大规模实施的可行性。

　　科学家建议将美国栗树与其他地区的栗树(例如对该真菌抗性更强的中国栗树)进行杂交，培育出既保留美国栗树特性、又能抵御真菌的新树种，从而解决濒危问题。

　　杂交树种的生长适应性存在隐患。听力指出，杂交过程中会融入中国栗树的基因，这类杂交树种可能更适应中国的生长环境，而美国的气候、土壤等自然条件与中国存在差异，杂交树种未必能在美国顺利生长，最终难以起到保护美国栗树种群的作用。

　　●学术讨论工作重复2023.9.9/2023.10.14

　　Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:Local governments have limited budgets to spend on enriching residents' lives. Supporting arts programs like concerts and museums offers cultural engagement, while funding recreational activities like hiking trails and parks promotes healthy lifestyles. As students who appreciate culture and wellness, let's discuss whether local funding should support arts programs or recreational activities more. Which do you think better serves the community and why?

　　Kelly:I think local governments should prioritize spending on outdoor trails and parks rather than arts programs like museums and concerts. More people would use and benefit from improved recreation spaces than arts venues if fewer residents are interested in the arts, they won't attend museums or concerts even if government funds them.

　　Paul:I believe local governments should actually prioritize spending on arts programs like museums and concerts rather than recreation. Precisely because fewer residents are inherently interested in the arts, public funding is essential to sustain these cultural institutions for the minority who appreciate them. Without support, access to the arts will decline and society will lose these enriching, enduring outlets for creative expression.

　　范文：

　　While both artistic and recreational funding are vital for a thriving community, I firmly believe that allocating a larger portion of the municipal budget to recreational activities like parks and trails yields more universal and equitable benefits. The primary reason for this is the direct and multifaceted impact on public health. Firstly, recreational infrastructure promotes physical wellness in a way that is accessible to a broader demographic. A free public park or a maintained hiking trail invites residents of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds to engage in exercise, which can mitigate public health crises like obesity and heart disease. For instance, a family might not be able to afford regular concert tickets, but they can utilize a community soccer field or a walking path at no cost every single day. This daily, inclusive access fosters a healthier populace, which in turn can reduce long-term public healthcare expenditures. That is not to diminish the profound value of the arts; cultural programs are indispensable for fostering creativity and community identity. However, recreational spaces often serve a dual purpose, also functioning as venues for cultural engagement. A central park can host free outdoor concerts, art installations, and community festivals, thereby merging the benefits of both categories. Therefore, by investing primarily in recreational infrastructure, a local government can create a foundational asset that supports not only physical health but also serves as a versatile platform for cultural events, ultimately delivering a greater and more inclusive return on investment for every citizen.

第二套

　　●综合写作生态系统重复2012.9.23/2019.8.10/2023.3.4

阅读

听力

　主题：The problems are serious enough to threaten the Everglades' future

　　One problem is the spread of invasive plants. These are plants that have been introduced into the Everglades from another part of the country or the world. Their spread harms the native plants and animals. For example, invasive cattails (grasslike plants) have been crowding out native plant species such as the saw grass: cattails grow too tall and thick for many bird and reptile species to nest in.

　　首先，由于靠近大沼泽地的地区进行农业活动，猫尾草和其他入侵植物在大沼泽地蔓延开来。农民在他们的田地里使用了人工肥料。这些肥料流入了大沼泽地，提高了那里的土壤养分含量。这是一个重大变化，因为大沼泽地的土壤过去一直养分含量较低。养分含量的增加为入侵植物的生长创造了有利条件，而损害了本土植物的生长，但最近已经采取措施限制周边农场的肥料使用。这应该会使大沼泽地的养分浓度恢复到自然水平，并阻止入侵物种的生长。

　　A second environmental problem is the drying of the Everglades. Most of the region has historically been water covered, marshy, and damp. But recently, the amount of water in the Everglades has decreased. This has made it difficult for some native plant species to survive, especially plants that are specifically adapted to a wet habitat in some places the soil has become so dry that it has turned to dust.

　　其次，水位下降主要是由于过去的洪水管理政策造成的。你可能会看到，在靠近大沼泽地的过去城市，在暴风雨过后经常会被洪水淹没。所以工程师们建造了一个渠道网络，基本上是人工水道，将水从人口密集地区排走，以防止洪水。问题在于这些渠道也会大量抽取埃弗格莱兹沼泽的水。不过，该地区有一个改变洪水管理的计划，其中最重要的一部分就是拆除一些渠道。

　　A third environmental issue that troubles the Everglades is the presence of high levels of mercury, a toxic metal: in the ecosystem. The levels are high enough to pose a danger to all life in the region, as it has been proven that even some very large animals in the Everglades have died of mercury poisoning. The threat of mercury affects not only the wildlife. but people who eat fish they have caught in the Everglades.

　　第三，埃弗格莱兹沼泽中的大部分汞来自发电厂燃烧煤炭时释放的污染物。这个问题也是可以得到控制的。例如，发电厂可以更加有针对性地选择煤炭。它们燃烧煤炭时，有些种类的煤汞含量高，而有些种类的煤汞含量低。许多发电厂已经改用低汞煤，同时还会采取其他措施来减少未来的汞污染。

　　●学术讨论教育重复2024.2.3/2025.5.17

　　Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:One traditional method of classroom instruction is lecturing. Lecturing involves the teacher talking about a topic for an extended period of time and expecting students to learn by listening attentively. Today, some educators believe that teachers should limit how much time they spend lecturing and instead teach by encouraging in-class discussions and having students work in groups. However, some teachers still teach primarily by lecturing. Do you believe lecturing is an effective teaching method? Why or why not?

　　Kelly:I believe lecturing can be an extremely effective way for professors to teach if they have strong communication skills. Some of my most memorable classes have been taught by brilliant lecturers who captivated me with their engaging speaking style ability to explain complex topics clearly, and passion for their subject matter.

　　Paul:I don't think pure lecturing works well as a teaching method. Without student participation, professors have no way to assess if students actually comprehend the material. Students can easily zone out during long lectures if they are just passively listening. Active learning through discussions, activities, and questions lets students engage with content and teachers identify gaps in understanding.

第三套

　　●综合写作科技

阅读

听力

　主题：alternative technologies for nuclear power plants

　　First, nuclear power plants present safety concerns, Radioactive materials that are used to generate energy in nuclear reactors (where the energy-generating reactions take place) pose a potential threat to human health. The risk of radioactive material escaping from the reactor into the environment increases greatly if the core of a reactor overheats. The public is uneasy about the safeguards presently in place to prevent reactors from becoming too hot.

　　First, the safety risks, the problems with overheating can be avoided with new designs of nuclear reactors called pebble bed reactors. This kind of reactor cannot overheat. When the temperature inside the reactor core rises above its normal operating temperature. The higher temperature has the effect of slowing the nuclear reactions in the core. As a result, the core stops generating excessive heat and starts to cool down this way. The pebble bed reactor regulates its own temperature. Since the reactions slow down, every time heat starts to build up, the temperature stays at a safe level. And the risk of contaminants escaping is greatly reduced.

　　Second, it is more expensive to build nuclear power plants than other types of plants. The construction of a typical nuclear power plant costs at least $2 billion and can be up to $5 billion. Nuclear plants are so much more expensive than conventional coal and oil plants because the specialized safety equipment they currently use to safe guard against accidents is expensive, and they may become still more expensive in the future if the public continues to demand even greater safety.

　　Second, the total cost of a nuclear power plant needs to be compared to other types of power plants. Sure. the cost to build a nuclear plant is high, but that's not the only thing to consider. Uranium, the radioactive fuel that nuclear plants require to produce energy, is comparatively cheap. While traditional fuels like coal and oil are more expensive and getting more expensive all the time. Over time, what you save on nuclear fuel more than compensates for the high construction costs. If you include fuel costs in the equation, nuclear plants make financial sense.

　　Third, there are other technologies that are better and cheaper than nuclear power. Wind turbines, for instance, are completely safe and, according to recent analyses, cost less than nuclear power. Further, turbines run on a renewable source of energy (wind), so their energy source will never be depleted.

　　Third wind may be a cheap and renewable energy source. but it's also unpredictable. It's strong one minute and weak the next. As a result, the power output from wind turbines is not reliable, which means that countries that use wind power usually also use another type of power generation as a backup. So, wind power cannot be a comprehensive energy source. Pollution, unlike nuclear power, which offers a steady output and needs no backup.

　　●学术讨论工作重复 2023.11.18/2024.2.27

　　Your professor is teaching a class on marketing. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe:This week, we talked about strategies for planning our work effectively. One strategy is the to-do list which is a list of tasks that must be accomplished daily or weekly. Some people believe to-do list are extremely helpful. while others believe they can cause us to be overwhelmed and lose focus on what is really important. In this discussion, share your view about using time-management strategies such as to-do lists: How helpful are they for your work or studies? Why?

　　Kelly:I can't function without to-do lists. I outline what my plan is every day because it helps me clarify what my goals are for the day. This provides the clear structure that I need to be productive. The best part of my day is when I check off my accomplishments at the end of the day and celebrate my small achievements.

　　Paul:It's interesting how things work differently for different people. I find to-do lists very unproductive because I usually overload my to-do lists with a lot of tasks and end up completing only a few items from the list. This makes me less motivated for the next day.