2025年11月8日下午场托福写作完整版答案及解析（含范文）

2025-11-10 11:56:45来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年SAT考试时间报名费用报考指南成绩查询送分流程成绩要求成绩换算
【资料推荐】SAT词汇巴朗3500系列SAT阅读OG1-8经典错题解析SAT数学满分冲刺重要知识点
【备考指导】CB发布2018年SAT考试官方报告SAT北美考点汇总美国大学TOP100SAT成绩要求

　　2025年11月8日的托福考试已经成为回忆，新东方在线SAT考试网为大家整理了此次考试的托福写作题目，让我们一起来回顾和分析这次的写作考查内容。

托福写作题目

第一套

　　●综合写作历史

阅读	听力
主题：the primary reason for the shift to factories
One theory is that the move to centralized factories was driven by the new technology. The Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth century is associated with large. complex machines that run on water or steam power. Obviously, such machines could not be used in workers' cottages, so it is tempting to conclude that factories arose because of technological advances.	/
Another theory attributes the rise of factories primarily to the strengthening of property rights in Britain in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. As a result private property in Britain received much stronger legal protection. This stimulated investment in factories by reassuring business owners that their investments in factory buildings and equipment-and the profits resulting from them-would be safe.	/
A third explanation is that business owners thought factories would help reduce their overall business expenses by reducing their transportation costs. In the cottage system, business owners had to pay the costs of transporting raw materials to and transporting finished goods back from each worker. Because worker cottages were ofter located far apart, these costs could be very high.	/

　　●学术讨论教育重复 2023.9.17

　　Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　· express and support your personal opinion

　　· make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe: As of this semester, I have embarked on a study to explore the various factors influencing children's cognition. It's becoming increasingly evident that a child's surroundings can significantly impact their development. In light of this, the question arises: should parents allow their children to watch online videos, whether for entertainment or educational purposes? Please share your insights on this matter, considering the potential effects on a child's cognitive growth.

　　Kelly: We should not allow young children, especially those under two years old, to watch videos. It's crucial for their development to engage in real-life communication with others during this critical period. Watching videos doesn't provide the opportunity for meaningful interaction. Even for older children, it's essential to prioritize physical activity over extended screen time. Instead of sitting still in front of screens, they should be encouraged to stay active to support their overall well-being.

　　Paul: I agree that very young children shouldn't be exposed to videos. However, I believe that older children can benefit from watching certain videos, especially those that showcase animals or provide unique insights not easily encountered in everyday life. These videos can be educational and expand their horizons by offering a window into experiences they might not otherwise have access to.

　　范文：

　　I firmly believe that parents should allow their children to watch online videos, provided this access is guided by intentional and active mediation. A blanket prohibition is not only impractical but also denies children access to a powerful modern pedagogical tool; the key lies not in if children watch, but in what they watch and how their engagement is structured.

　　The primary justification for allowing video access is its unparalleled capacity for enhancing and supplementing formal education. Educational platforms like Khan Academy or YouTube channels like National Geographic Kids can transform abstract academic concepts into vivid, engaging content. For instance, a child struggling to understand planetary orbits can watch a high-definition NASA animation that demonstrates the phenomenon with a clarity a textbook diagram cannot match. This multimodal learning caters to diverse cognitive styles and can ignite a lifelong passion for a subject. Furthermore, research in educational psychology suggests that well-produced video content can significantly improve knowledge retention by creating strong visual and auditory associations.

　　However, this access must be counterbalanced by proactive parental involvement to mitigate the well-documented risks of passive consumption and algorithmic manipulation. Unsupervised, children can easily fall down rabbit holes of low-quality or inappropriate content. Therefore, parents should adopt a strategy of "co-viewing"—watching videos with their children and discussing the content—and utilize curated platforms like YouTube Kids with strict parental controls. This transforms a solitary activity into an interactive learning experience, allowing parents to help their children critically evaluate the information they encounter and apply it to the real world.

　　Critics may argue that screen time inherently detracts from physical activity and social development. While this is a valid concern, it underscores the necessity of balance, not prohibition. A child's daily schedule that includes video-based learning, outdoor play, and social interaction is not only feasible but holistic.

　　In conclusion, online videos are a neutral tool whose impact is determined by its use. With thoughtful curation and active parental guidance, digital video content can be a invaluable asset in a child's cognitive and creative development, preparing them for a future in which digital literacy is fundamental.

第二套

　　●综合写作历史

阅读	听力
主题：一个墓属不属于某个
/	/
/	/
/	/

　　●学术讨论社会现象重复 2023.9.24

　　Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor’s question.

　　In your response, you should

　　·express and support your personal opinion

　　·make a contribution to the discussion in your own words

　　An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

　　Doctor Achebe: In recent years, with the increasing prevalence of online payment methods, we've seen a significant decrease in the use of cash for everyday transactions. This shift has prompted a debate about whether it's a positive or negative development. So, let me pose this question to you: With the decrease in cash usage due to the rise of online payments, do you consider this trend to be positive or negative? Why or why not?

　　Kelly: This is indeed a positive development because it offers tremendous convenience. We can complete transactions with just our smartphones, eliminating the need to carry a wallet full of cash and coins. This convenience not only streamlines our daily routines but also reduces the risk of theft or loss associated with physical cash.

　　Paul: This trend is negative because it disconnects us from our spending habits. When we use cash, we have a tangible sense of how much money we're spending, which helps us keep track of our expenses. With digital payments, it's easier to lose sight of our financial transactions, potentially leading to overspending and financial mismanagement.